[PREV - SIZE] [TOP]
PARSIMONY
May 26, 1992
There's a barrier at the beginning
of every story that takes effort to
penetrate. You need to learn
something about the characters, the
style of writing, and get a sense
of the direction of the plot before
you get can get drawn into the
story.
With Science Fiction and
Fantasy this barrier is even
larger, since fewer things
are given: you also need to
understand the social and
technological premises of
the story. If you're
reading for "escape", then
most of the effort is spent
at the beginning, and the
payoff is whatever follows.
So you get series. And
really *long* books.
Sometimes you get series
of long books.
It used to be assumed that entertaining
fiction should have as few words as
possible, because people with poor reading
skills would be intimidated by massive There's an Algis
tomes. Now, the opposite idea seems to be Budrys theory that
in play. the "unnecessary"
verbiage in
bestsellers gives
poor readers a
chance to catch up.
So, once upon a time, novels were
tight, parsimonious, like say:
Delany's "Babel-17" (Though... there was a converse
Algis Budrys' "Rogue Moon" problem: abrupt, forced endings
tacked on when the arbitrary
page limit was near.)
Now they tend to be sprawling,
overweight monstrosities.
It seems to me that everything
reads like it's in need of
cutting, even a lot of the For example Pamela Sargent's
books that I like. _Venus of Dreams_ and _Venus of
Shadows_ both drag in places.
So, how about creating a new
Hugo category for books over
a certain length?
"Bloats" wouldn't be a
bad name, though I have a
certain fondness for
"Damn Fat Books".
--------
[NEXT - DEATH_OF_THE_ALBUM]