[PREV - UNGAINLY_MESSES]    [TOP]

MOBY_DICK


                                                            May  3, 2019 
There's an old joke, I don't remember from where,                        
                                                                         
  First guy:   So, did you read "Hamlet"?                                
  Second guy:  Yeah, I did.  I didn't like it.                           
  First guy:   Well, you're wrong!                                       
                                                                         
This is a joke so un-funny I might've come up with it,                   
but it was actually from someone else, and I think                       
the syndrome is all too familiar.                                        
                                                                         
Melville's "Moby-Dick" (1851) strikes me as a pretty                     
terrible book, and actually it strikes a fair number      I'm not a big fan
of people as a terrible book (though admittedly, for      of Twain's     
different reasons), and in point of fact no one           "Huckleberry Finn"
really liked this book when it was first published--      but at least people
if you see someone rhapsodizing about what this great     liked his stuff.
American classic tells you about the American spirit,                    
the right answer would be not too much, since no one           HAWKING_FINN
cared about it-- it was canonized much later.                            
                                                                         
                                                                             
   As wikipedia has it:           https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moby-Dick    
                                                                             
   "Moby-Dick was published to mixed reviews, was                            
   a commercial failure, and was out of print at                             
   the time of the author's death in 1891. Its                               
   reputation as a 'Great American Novel' was                            
   established only in the 20th century, after the                       
   centennial of its author's birth."                                    
                                                                         
   This wikipedia page doesn't at present contain much                   
   detail about who anointed Moby-Dick in the 20th                       
   century.  It does mention E.M. Forster as an early                    
   enthusiast, quoting some comments from 1927.                          
                                                                         
       So: Dashiell Hammett was already                                  
       publishing before Moby-Dick became      Hammett's "Red Harvest" was
       one a them Great American Novels.       published in 1929, incorporating
                                               stories published as early as
                                               1927.  The Continental Op had
                                               been introduced in "The Black
                                               Mask" in 1923.




I've written about Moby-Dick a number of times,
but somehow it's never made it to these pages.
The points, in outline:

 o  when I read a great classic of American            But then, my old
    literature from before 1900 or so, I often         rants on this point
    feel like I'm looking at a dancing bear.           are overstated:

 o  the material about the whaling industry               ANTIAMERICAN
    in Moby-Dick stikes me as it's most
    interesting aspect--                               What about:
                                                       Edgar Allen Poe
           Though other detractors of Moby             Walt Whitman
           Dick point to this as a problem.

 o  the second most interesting thing is the
    homoerotic material, in particular the          And this is something it
    undercurrent of interacial homosexuality.       has in common with another
                                                    Great American Novel,
                                                    "Huckleberry Finn", which
 o  it has some other oddities about it no          does make one wonder.
    one seems to mention, e.g. Chapter 40
    is written in what appears to be musical
    comedy format.  A drag theater group could
    do a good job with it, if they were up
    for the butch costuming.
                                                     UNGAINLY_MESSES
 o  shorn of these oddities, what you have is a
    heavy-handed religious parable, something
    about contending with god (the great white
    whale) and meeting your inevitable doom.

          This strikes as so grossly
          sophomoric it seems like a bad joke.

          It's such an obviously weak
          novel, I'm not sure why it          auostrilover wrote:    [link]
          would have present-day
          defenders, except that they've      "Melville anticipated the
          been told it's great, so they       postmodern novel more than
          need to contrive reasons.           half a century before
                                              modernism.  Moby-Dick was
                                              just astoundingly ahead of
                                              its time."

 o  The book was not well-recieved when          Dude, try reading
    first published, which undercuts the         "Tristram Shandy".
    usual defense of older works: "you
    have to get into the mindset of the          Before the modern era,
    audience when it was first published".       it wasn't that hard to
                                                 write "post-modern".
            If you do that job
            right, you'd have a                  And anticipating
            better understanding of              "post-modernism" (an
            why this book flopped,               intellectual pan-flash of
            not why it should be                 the latter 20th) isn't
            regarded as great now.               anything to be proud of.


Fans of Moby-Dick like to talk about how                   [link]
it's open to multiple intepretations, e.g.
                                                         eligodfrey defends Moby
    Does the white whale represent:                      as existential realism:

       (1) god                                           "In fact it's a pretty
       (2) evil                                          straightforward musing
       (3) nature              A silly question, of      on whaling, and by
       (4) Hellman's           course: we're talking     extension America...
           mayonnaise          *American* symbolism.     and humanity."
                               Nature is green, Evil
    Or, my personal answer:    is black, and God is          Then you get the
                               white.  Duh.                  "open to inter-
       (5) what difference                                   pretation" defense,
           does it make?                                     where the disparate
                                                             takes on why it's
                                                             good becomes
                                                             evidence of it's
                                                             goodness.
"Moby-Dick" made no splash when first published,
but despite this it made it on the list of "books
that shaped America". The Associate Press tells
us this is because:
                                                        [link]
  "Herman Melville's tale of the Great White Whale
  and the crazed Captain Ahab who declares he will
  chase him 'round perdition's flames before I give
  him up' has become an American myth. Even people
  who have never read Moby-Dick know the basic plot,
  and references to it are common in other works of
  American literature and in popular culture, such
  as the Star Trek film 'The Wrath of Khan' (1982)."

But has it ever been on "The Simpsons"?
                                               American culture has shaped
And if Moby ever went up against               the Moby myth much more than
King Kong, I know who'd win.                   vice versa.


In an interview in The Atlantic, David Gilbert
expresses his love for Moby-Dick:                  [link]

    "I know it makes no sense, or comes across as
    pretentious nonsense, but so often when reading
    this book I find myself on the verge of tears
    and I have no idea why. A lost world perhaps? A
    striving for connection? A certain secular
    religiosity. No matter, the whales are doomed."


                             Ah Melville, ah humanity.


                             [link]




--------
[NEXT - DOWNVOTE_CLUB]