[PREV - HUGO] [TOP]
BRENNER_SCALE
December 17, 2005
Rev: January 23, 2007
You know how people rate
stuff "on a scale of 1 to
10" and so on?
Well, the "Brenner Scale" As invented by the
is a little different
(of course): TOADKEEPER
Zero is neutral, with
positive or negative
values counting up or
down from there.
Roughly there Though really
are 7 levels: it's a little
+1 more complicated
+1/2 than that.
0+
0 There are ratings
0- such as "0+?",
-1/2 where the uncertainty
-1 might indicate it's
a little weaker
than a "0+".
Some features: (And why we put
the plus or minus
o Zero is absolutely after the zero,
neutral, neither I could not tell
good or bad. you.)
o If you feel like you
gained something, you
give it a positive Note: the focus is on
rating; if you feel your own reactions.
like you lost
something, then you You're not allowed to
give it a negative. count the benefit to
some hypothetical It could be that
o There's no specified audience. this is a flaw
limit to the range of of the scale.
the numbers, but being
very restrained in You can not
magnitudes is use it to
recommended. judge politcal
propaganda,
Most things just get rated for example.
0+ or 0-: "plus side of The idea is to
neutral" or "minus side of be sparing
neutral". with praise.
On occasion you'll see a Having a
+1/2 or so. relatively small
number of levels
A rating of +1 is helps keep you
extremely high praise. from getting
bogged down in
inane comparisons.
"Does this deserve
a 6 out of 10? But
isn't it a little
better than that
Works of art can't thing I just gave
be compared in a 7 to?"
quality with any
meaningful degree of It's a much simpler
precision, so you question to answer:
shouldn't try. "Do I feel like I
got something from
(The interpolation this, or was it a
of those "1/2" levels waste of time?"
is something of a
compromise on that
original notion.)
You can, if you like,
interpolate more values,
e.g. 3/4... but that's
so awkward, in practice
you're going to avoid
doing it.
That's a feature.
--------
[NEXT - WHATSNEW]